Wireless Cell Phone

Cell Phone Tower Radiation, Children & Brain Tumor

http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html
http://www.danger911.com
A CONTROVERSIAL plan for a phone mast is back on the table - but is now set to be bigger.

Vodafone withdrew original proposals for an 11ft pole with three antennas back in October 2006 after complaints from residents.

But now the mobile phone company has submitted new plans for a 12ft pole with SIX antennas just 100 metres from elderly residents’ homes.

The plans would see the mast placed on the green area in front of the Methodist Church on the corner of Ludwick Way and Cole Green Lane in WGC.

Residents and shopkeepers are already gathering signatures against the plans.

Speaking to the WHT, the Rev John Churcher said he was just as concerned two years on.

In a letter to Welwyn Hatfield Council, which will decide on the planning application, he said: “Why is it necessary for Vodafone to install these six antennas right in the centre of a residential area, with children constantly passing on their way to local shops and schools?

“With a number of elderly people living within 100 metres of the proposed antennas, who are suffering from and being treated for cancer, why add to their anxiety by placing antennas that transmit low level radiation so close to their homes?”

Cole Green House resident Del Walker, whose living room looks out on to the green, was also against the plans.

The 73-year-old said: “We have three golf courses in the town with more than enough room for them.

“Why can’t it go in the industrial estates or in the council office’s car park?

“It’s so intrusive.”

No-one at Vodafone was available for comment at time of writing.
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html

Duration : 0:2:43

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | January 2nd, 2009

Electrosmog, Wi-Fi, Cellphone Radiation, Microwaves Pt. 1

Speaker and researcher Walter Graham join us for a very interesting and important discussion on Wi-Fi (wireless internet), microwaves, cell phone radiation and electro smog. Topics Discussed: The frequency of microwave ovens and the frequency of Wi-Fi, the rise of Electro smog in recent years, how does microwaves behave, “Hot Spot”, Orange, Health issues related to cell phone towers, global coverage, schools getting new laptops with Wi-Fi, Microwave weaponry, microwaving your food, Melatonin levels, depression, blood brain barrier, mercury, toxins, DNA damage, fertility problems, male sperm count is down, cell phone radiation connected with symptoms close to Alzheimer’s disease (swish cheese brain), Bees die off, DECT Phones, Solutions: Faraday cage, the sounds of the Wi-Fi with a Electro smog Detector and much more. We continue our discussion with Walter Graham and expand change gears and talk about fluoride. Is it good or bad to fluoridate the water, what about fluoride in toothpaste? What is the history of fluoride, and what is the science behind it? Don’t miss our very important subscriber interview with Walter Graham.

Duration : 0:10:0

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | January 2nd, 2009

Are Cell Phones and Wireless Devices Dangerous?

The question of cell phone safety is at the forefront following Larry King Live having the widow of Johnny Cochran and medical experts on his show talking about Johnny’s brain tumor and cell phone radiation. The issue is again pertinent with Ted Kennedy and his brain tumor.

For years the common assumption was that electromagnetic fields [EMF] and electromagnetic radiation [EMR] was not harmful, even though troubling science has been cropping up for decades. The public was of the opinion that if there was a problem, the industry would have fixed it, and, besides, the government would protect us.
However, international government regulations regarding emf’s only protect against heating of tissue from short term exposure. They don’t protect against health problems due to long term, non thermal exposure. Unfortunately, the regulations are based on outdated science and primarily formulated from industry funded studies.
The courts are now starting to find for the plaintifs in cases of non thermal EMR injuries. The Alaska Supreme Court recently found in favour of an industry technician injured at his work from non thermal EMR. [click here to view] Two Workers’ Compensation claims were successful in California, again for non thermal effects. There are currently seven class action lawsuits against the wireless industry in the United States.
We suggest that you do your own research, and come to your own conclusions. Visit my website to view informative articles:
http://www.EMRx.org

Duration : 0:2:56

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | December 31st, 2008

Effects of cell phone radiation by David

Mobile phone radiation and health concerns have been raised, especially following the enormous increase in the use of wireless mobile telephony throughout the world (as of August 2005, there were more than 2 billion users worldwide). Mobile phones use electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range, and some[1] believe this may be harmful to human health. These concerns have induced a large body of research (both epidemiological and experimental, in non-human animals as well as in humans). Concerns about effects on health have also been raised regarding other digital wireless systems, such as data communication networks.

The World Health Organization, based upon the consensus view of the scientific and medical communities, states that health effects (e.g. headaches) are very unlikely to be caused by cellular phones or their base stations,[2][3] and expects to make recommendations about mobile phones in October 2009.[4]

However, some national radiation advisory authorities, including those of Austria,[5] France,[6] Germany,[7] and Sweden[8] recommended to their citizens measures to minimize exposure. Examples of the recommendations are:

Duration : 0:5:50

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | December 29th, 2008

Dangers of cell phone wi-fi radiation Georg Carlo Part 3

Dr. Carlo Heads Cell Phone Research
CELL PHONE RADIATION: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

 Originally developed for the Department of Defense, cell phones devices were never tested for safety. They entered the marketplace due to a regulatory loophole.
 Questions about cell phone safety arose in the early 1990s, when a businessman filed a lawsuit alleging that cell phones caused his wife’s death due to brain cancer.
 To address the questions surrounding cell phone safety, the cell phone industry set up a non-profit organization, Wireless Technology Research (WTR). Dr. George Carlo was appointed to head WTR’s research efforts.
 Under Dr. Carlo’s direction, scientists found that cell phone radiation caused DNA damage, impaired DNA repair, and interfered with cardiac pacemakers.
 European research confirmed Dr. Carlo’s findings. Studies suggest that cell phone radiation contributes to brain dysfunction, tumors, and potentially to conditions such as autism, attention deficit disorder, neurodegenerative disease, and behavioral and psychological problems.
 Dr. Carlo brought safety information about cell phones to the public through his book, Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, and by creating the Safe Wireless Initiative and the Mobile Telephone Health Concerns Registry.
 The best protection against cell phone radiation is keeping a safe distance.
 Always use a headset to minimize exposure to harmful cell phone radiation.
To learn more go to http://www.CellphoneLies.com http://www.emfnews.org

Duration : 0:9:49

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | December 17th, 2008

Dangers of cell phone wi-fi radiation Georg Carlo Part 2.wmv

Dr. Carlo Heads Cell Phone Research
CELL PHONE RADIATION: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
http://www.CellphoneLies.com http://www.emfnews.org
 Originally developed for the Department of Defense, cell phones devices were never tested for safety. They entered the marketplace due to a regulatory loophole.
 Questions about cell phone safety arose in the early 1990s, when a businessman filed a lawsuit alleging that cell phones caused his wife’s death due to brain cancer.
 To address the questions surrounding cell phone safety, the cell phone industry set up a non-profit organization, Wireless Technology Research (WTR). Dr. George Carlo was appointed to head WTR’s research efforts.
 Under Dr. Carlo’s direction, scientists found that cell phone radiation caused DNA damage, impaired DNA repair, and interfered with cardiac pacemakers.
 European research confirmed Dr. Carlo’s findings. Studies suggest that cell phone radiation contributes to brain dysfunction, tumors, and potentially to conditions such as autism, attention deficit disorder, neurodegenerative disease, and behavioral and psychological problems.
 Dr. Carlo brought safety information about cell phones to the public through his book, Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, and by creating the Safe Wireless Initiative and the Mobile Telephone Health Concerns Registry.
 The best protection against cell phone radiation is keeping a safe distance.
 Always use a headset to minimize exposure to harmful cell phone radiation.
To learn more go to http://www.CellphoneLies.com http://www.emfnews.org

Duration : 0:9:48

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | December 7th, 2008

San Francisco Residents Take on the Cell Phone Industry

Excerpt from the film “Bad Reception: The Wireless Revolution in San Francisco” (2003)

For more information, see www.antennafreeunion.org

Exploring the dangers of microwave radiation used by cellular phones, cellular antennas, and other new wireless technologies, “Bad Reception: The Wireless Revolution in San Francisco” tells the compelling story of residents from backgrounds as diverse as the city itself taking to the streets and taking on City Hall to protest the politically powerful and poorly regulated wireless industry.

“Though there are triumphs recorded here, including an emotional victory over a proposed antenna in the upper Fillmore, ‘Bad Reception’ … ominously hints that the fight is far from over.” — San Francisco Bay Guardian.

Duration : 0:2:14

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | December 1st, 2008

Dr. George Carlo EMF Cell Phone Dangers Interview

http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
TV Interview with Dr. Carlo (Campbell Live, TV3)
Dr. Carlo talks about the cell phone industry’s marketing towards children and the epidemic projections from cell phone use.George Carlo and Martin Schram are aiming to become information-age Ralph Naders. They ask a question that ought to concern America’s 103 million mobile phone users, as well as those who merely come within earshot of these popular devices: Is the wireless future a threat to public health? “Visit any public building, college classroom, courthouse, or commuter train, and look around: You’ll see people using not just wireless phones but also wireless laptop computers and miniature palm tops,” write Carlo and Schram. “What you won’t see are the microwaves that are criss-crossing a confined space where a number of people who are not even using these instruments are bombarded by these waves.” It sounds creepy. And Carlo, an epidemiologist who once oversaw a multimillion-dollar research project on health for the cellular industry, believes the news is not good: there may be a link between cell phone use and brain tumors. The research is not conclusive, but Carlo and Schram think it’s disturbing enough to warrant government action. Needless to say, the industry that once backed Carlo’s work now considers him persona non grata.
Due largely to Carlo’s coauthorship, Cell Phones is unavoidably a one-sided story. Key business figures didn’t agree to interviews. In fact, this might have been a better book if it were written by Schram, with Carlo as one of several major characters rather than a collaborator. Then again, it would lack the passionate advocacy that will draw many readers to it. And even the most skeptical may want to take a few of the simple safety precautions the authors recommend in a concluding chapter, such as wearing a headset or earpiece when using a cell phone, in order to keep a distance from the radiation-emitting antennae. One look at the x-ray photos reproduced in the book, which show how radiation easily penetrates skulls, will give even the most impervious observer second thoughts. One thing is probably certain: This book is a harbinger of litigation. If Carlo and Schram are correct about their concerns, the cellular industry–as unbelievable as it sounds–may go the way of Big Tobacco. –John J. Miller –This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

From Publishers Weekly
In 1993, when the cell phone industry’s chief lobbyist hired epidemiologist and pathologist Carlo to refute claims that cell phones, which had never been subjected to premarket testing, cause cancer, no one thought he would discover otherwise. But after six years of exhaustive analysis and scrupulous peer review, the results proved, according to this report, that radiation from a cell phone’s antenna can cause the formation of micronuclei red flags for cancer in the brain. Children in particular are more susceptible to the radiation than adults. Carlo reported his findings to the industry and the FDA and advocated for continued research, but both parties still maintain that cell phones are safe. Here, Carlo and syndicated columnist Schram retrace Carlo’s scientific undertaking and what they cast as a sinister web of corporate greed and masterful PR “spin” that choked his efforts. Schram provides the primary narrative, with Carlo’s insights and recollections scattered throughout, a format that grows repetitive. Despite the captivating story, many consumers won’t want to slog through the detailed scientific explanations to get to the bottom-line safety recommendations. Journalists, policymakers and consumer advocacy groups, however, will find this no-holds-barred book extraordinarily informative as they continue investigations of the industry. Agent, Ronald L. Goldfarb.
http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Duration : 0:5:50

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | November 27th, 2008

Cell Phone Tower Power or Cellphone Deception.

http://www.CellphoneLies.com Every day, we’re swimming in a sea of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) produced by electrical appliances, power lines, wiring in buildings, and a slew of other technologies that are part of modern life. From the dishwasher and microwave oven in the kitchen and the clock radio next to your bed, to the cellular phone you hold to your ear—sometimes for hours each day—exposure to EMR is growing and becoming a serious health threat.

But there’s a huge public health crisis looming from one particular threat: EMR from cellular phones—both the radiation from the handsets and from the tower-based antennas carrying the signals—which studies have linked to development of brain tumors, genetic damage, and other exposure-related conditions.1-9 Yet the government and a well-funded cell phone industry media machine continue to mislead the unwary public about the dangers of a product used by billions of people. Most recently, a Danish epidemiological study announced to great fanfare the inaccurate conclusion that cell phone use is completely safe.10

George Carlo, PhD, JD, is an epidemiologist and medical scientist who, from 1993 to 1999, headed the first telecommunications industry-backed studies into the dangers of cell phone use. That program remains the largest in the history of the issue. But he ran afoul of the very industry that hired him when his work revealed preventable health hazards associated with cell phone use.

In this article, we look at why cell phones are dangerous; Dr. Carlo’s years-long battle to bring the truth about cell phone dangers to the public; the industry’s campaign to discredit him and other scientists in the field; and what you can do to protect yourself now emf radiation emf dangers cellphone radiation dangers computer electro hypersensitivy EMF protection EMF Protection Shield Dangers of the wireless cell phone, wi-fi and emf age
http://www.emfnews.org

Duration : 0:3:33

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | November 21st, 2008

Matt Gonzalez Takes on the Cell Phone Industry

Excerpt from the film “Bad Reception: The Wireless Revolution in San Francisco” (2003)

For more information, see www.antennafreeunion.org

Exploring the dangers of microwave radiation used by cellular phones, cellular antennas, and other new wireless technologies, “Bad Reception: The Wireless Revolution in San Francisco” tells the compelling story of residents from backgrounds as diverse as the city itself taking to the streets and taking on City Hall to protest the politically powerful and poorly regulated wireless industry.

“Though there are triumphs recorded here, including an emotional victory over a proposed antenna in the upper Fillmore, ‘Bad Reception’ … ominously hints that the fight is far from over.” — San Francisco Bay Guardian.

Duration : 0:6:9

Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add A Comment | November 2nd, 2008
Get Ringtones...Click Here!

Sponsor

Get Ringtones...Click Here!

Pages

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Meta

Tags

Meta